In a Financial Road Map® with a potential client we got to Commitment to Hire™. The husband said that he had a pretty good handle on everything and most of their finances were in his head. In going through what we do, I saw many flaws in their financial plans. In the end I asked the question regarding, “on a scale of 1 - 10…” The husband was an 8 and the wife was a 6-7. What would you say when you can see many flaws in a prospective client’s current planning and when there is a difference in the partners’ opinion on their financial house position? The husband is a lawyer and after hearing your latest webinar can understand why they may not be good fit. The husband said they needed some planning but not at the fee I had set. The potential clients could see the value for “certain people” for this service however cost seemed to be a major issue for them. These people fit my Ideal Client Profile.

Article ID: 487
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019
There is no need to point out "flaws." All that matters is that they are not a ‘10’ and want to be. If they do not desire to be a ‘10’ and / or are unwilling to pay your fee they are not Ideal Clients. The sure sign that someone is actually an Ideal Client is that they hire you. That's what Ideal Clients do. If they did not hire you... they are not an Ideal Client... period. I believe you are in a degree of Ideal Client denial in that you want people who are not Ideal Clients to be Ideal Clients. This is understandable, but not acceptable. You must see people for who they really are, not who you want them to be. If you wanted to have some fun, you could ask the question, "If it's all in your head, what happens to your wife if something happens to you?" Or, ask her, "How do you feel about your financial future being in your husband’s head?" Or, say to him, "You're kidding, right? Are you really sitting here, with a straight face, justifying that you don't need to hire me because 'you have pretty good handle on most of your finances in your head? Counselor, I do not think your position will survive cross examination, but I'd like to hear you try." Sit back, relax, and enjoy the show. The goal with non-Ideal Clients isn't to shake them up so they become Ideal Clients. The purpose of asking some questions "for fun," as described above is to make a difference. He won't hire you, but he won't soon forget the meeting either. You challenging him to consider his process may prompt some thinking or a conversation later that could change his life for the better. Have fun. Go get clients.
Also listed in
folder Financial Road Map® Misc.
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Ideal Clients v. Non-Ideal Clients/Survival Clients
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Disengaging from Non-Ideal Clients
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Ideal Clients Resisting to Hire/"Let Me Think About It for Awhile."


Others in this category
b What do you think of this scripting when the prospective clients are talking in great detail: “I appreciate that you want to tell me the details about this, and should we decide to work together professionally, I will need to know more. For the purpose of this exercise, however, I just need to summarize the facts. I have 8 minutes budgeted for this. Would you be willing to give me a few minutes to go through your documents?"
b What do you say to someone who doesn't think they need a financial adviser? During the Pre-Commitment™, a prospective client specified that he didn't feel he needed a financial adviser. Thus he never agreed to become a client. Is there something I should have said or should I just move on to the next person who "gets it"?
b There are many forms that my clients must fill out. They are not something that can be done in the "let's take a few moments to make that happen" section. I need to prepare the paperwork and it takes more than a few moments. What I like to do is have the clients come back in to do the paperwork and go over any other information in the questionnaires I need. Then, after that, I will complete the plan and have the clients back in to go over that plan.
b How well does the Mastery Series™ work for advisors who do not work off fees?
b I am struggling not discussing an ongoing fee in Financial Road Map® Meeting. During this conversation the clients ask me how much? The Financial Road Map® Meeting has been around 45 minutes so far and going well. I say $5,000 for the initial plan. They say what do you get? I then run through my 2 page letter of engagement which outlines upfront and ongoing service offering and takes another 45 minutes. After 1.5 hours I feel like the clients are tired and the "would you like to proceed” has lost its presence because of the meeting time. How do I avoid this? I would love to skip the letter of engagement all together, should I just briefly talk about deliverables team (which I have) best-in-class Subject Matters Experts. I am also struggling to understand in the Implementation Meeting how to address the ongoing fee is $1k-$3k per month and not go over the plan in any detail.
» More articles