My independent practice is currently fee-based without Assets Under Management (AUM) or insurance commissions. My goal is to build my business to 50 Ideal Clients. I have been unable to identify any money managers who charge a flat fee to manage assets.

Article ID: 534
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019

These are two separate issues. One issue is YOUR compensation and the other is the money manager's compensation. You can charge your clients a flat-fee for YOUR services and embedded within the investment management deliverable there could be basis points for expenses related to the services of the money management subject-matter expert, none of which are paid to you. These basis points for money management come out of your client's assets and are paid directly to the money management Subject Matter Expert. This is a perfectly acceptable way to operate until you find a money manager who is willing to manage the money for flat fee.

Your fiduciary responsibility, and one of the many reasons that you are so valuable to your clients, is that you accomplish appropriate money management for your clients in a very, very cost-effective manner. Almost certainly more cost-effectively than they are doing by themselves or is currently being done for them by a more traditional financial advisor or "wealth manager."

My understanding is that you can fairly easily accomplish high-quality asset management for 25 - 75 basis points.

You have the same goal of delivering high value in the most cost-efficient manner with every other element of comprehensive financial services: tax planning, financial planning, insurance, and legal. Some of these services might easily be included in YOUR fee and others may be paid by the client directly to the service-provider separately from what they pay you. An example of this is when a client refinances their home. The points and closing costs are not included in your fee, nor do you receive any payment from the mortgage provider, but you play an integral role in knowing high quality resources for mortgages, determining which loan is best, and accomplishing the refinancing in the most cost-effective manner.

Your primary goal is to deliver the Value-Based Financial Planning® Value Proposition:

1. Help your clients align their financial choices with their most important goals and most deeply held values.
2. Help your clients get their entire financial house in order and keep it that way forever.
3. Help your clients have a 10 level of confidence that no matter what happens in the markets, the economy, or the world that they will achieve their goals. THAT'S what YOUR fee is for.

Also listed in
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Commitment to Hire Conversation™ Misc.


Others in this category
b The participants in happy relationships can sometimes have different ideas about the value of money, goals and how resources can/should be used to accomplish goals. How is this handled by the Bachrach & Associates process?
b How "realistic" should I be when thinking about my ideal life, my Predictable Minimum Annual Recurring Revenue and Ideal Client Profile? I'm wondering if I need to temper my goals now that I'm starting to work on some of the numbers. It seems if I lower my target income number I could get there faster. I've heard that if anyone ever tells you to "be realistic" they're asking you to compromise your ideals.
b I am uncertain of how to proceed in the following situation: My 85 year old client (client for 20 years) now needs aged care accommodation. His sons are taking power over his financial affairs without notifying him to avoid any upset. I saw him last week. He is in good shape considering and understands the need for aged care but not aware the sons have taken over control of the financial affairs I met with the sons last week and am due to meet again on November 24th about their father’s care and ongoing service. I have already offer them the opportunity to get their respective Financial Road Maps® completed -- One dominant brother had responded back, “No, not required at this stage.” My client warned me about 7 years ago to be very careful of the dominant son. The sons are anxious to get father repositioned (I hope for right reasons) into aged care --- without some of the streamlined systems I have used in last 7-8 years --- aged care would have occurred much earlier. This is a good client (past loyalty) and a survival client at approximately $24k paid annually. Should I ask the sons to reposition to a new adviser given that my client is their father and they now wish to take over his affairs? I would like to help the father but feel it’s incorrect to get involved with him and his sons.
b I have been advised that there is a psychology that comes into play when a client pays for services (They are much more invested in the process if they pay for the service, no matter how little/much). If the payment does not take place until implementation [%AUM], does this minimize their commitment to the process? (Your experience here, please). What if there is no formal agreement to sign until implementation and the transfer of assets? What affect does this have? Do you have something that can be used? I am trying to find a "workaround" to the Financial Planning Agreement of my RIA, while still being compliant.
b How do you determine what Planning Fee is appropriate for each client? I would imagine that different client circumstances require a different Planning Fee. You mention on tape from $2500-$3000. This seems high to me.
» More articles