I recently had an experience where I had push back from a client when I asked for where all of their assets were located and then found a very small asset at another firm that they had opened up recently. It kind of irritated me and I asked why they had bought the policy. The client responded a little negatively and now I am wondering whether or not I should re-engage them with the Financial Road Map® and ask the Commitment to Implement Conversation™ questions or politely tell them that I do not want to work with them?

Article ID: 455
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019
It's hard to say whether the client responded negatively because of the situation or because they responded to your irritation. Either way, you and this client have some relationship work to do. My advice is that you tell the truth about your expectations and ask them what they think about being a client at that level. Relax. Be open. And enjoy a candid, honest exchange. Try not to get irritated.

Others in this category
b Is it better, and more professional, to ask the clients to hand all the Financial Documents over and comb through the statements myself rather than having them explain their own Financial Documents?
b Is that flat Predictable Minimum Annual Recurring Revenue fee or % of net worth fee in addition to the 1% of AUM that I charge for their investments that we now manage?
b Should I let the client explain their financial documents? I find that it's often easier if the client explains their financial documents, since they know how to best interpret what they've brought.
b How do you determine what Planning Fee is appropriate for each client? I would imagine that different client circumstances require a different Planning Fee. You mention on tape from $2500-$3000. This seems high to me.
b Under my current model, there are different means of compensation, depending upon the deliverable (I.e., planning fee, % of AUM, insurance commission, other). It seems that the planning fee would logically be part of the Commitment to Hire. When would the other pieces be brought into the discussion?
» More articles