Prior to hiring Bachrach & Associates, Inc., I had already created several of the deliverables on an annual basis for clients. I have been charging between $500 and $1,000 for this type of planning in addition to AUM wrap fees. Can you help me gain clarity and perhaps some verbiage on why a current client should pay 2x-3x times what they are used to?

Article ID: 429
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019
At this point you may not be able to justify why they should pay more money. As you continue on your Values-Based Financial Planning™ journey, however, you will be learning about a level of client experience, client service, and value delivered that will easily justify a higher, maybe significantly higher, fee. Whether a client chooses to come to your New World and pay the higher fee for the greater value is for you to work out with your clients. The clients who come into the New World will be your base from which you build your entire Ideal Client Community, by referral only.

On the other hand, you may already be charging too low of a fee for the value you provide. In which case, the language might sound like, "After doing some serious numbers crunching in my business it has become clear to me that I've been charging much too low of a fee for the service and value that I have been providing. As such, we will be right-sizing our fee to $_______ / __________, effective ______________. Do you have any questions about this change?"

Be prepared to answer whatever questions they have. Don't be surprised if some of your clients overtly concur that they have wondered how you could do so much for so little.
Also listed in
folder Commitment to Implement Conversation™
folder Implementation Meeting
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Commitment to Hire Conversation™ Misc.


Others in this category
b The participants in happy relationships can sometimes have different ideas about the value of money, goals and how resources can/should be used to accomplish goals. How is this handled by the Bachrach & Associates process?
b I am in self referral land, and I've had a few occasions when I've been treated like a salesperson (I've already got an investment guy, you're a money guy, etc.). What is your compelling response to that?
b Should the implementation of a clients plan be done in a single Implementation Meeting or should it be done over several meetings as to not overwhelm the client with information? Currently my dealer has developed something called the total client experience which calls for meeting with the client 5 times in total. Here is an overview of the meetings; 1-introductory meeting,2-portfolio management meeting,3-risk management,4-banking relationship review,4-tax/estate planning, and 5-progress review meetings. I like how it breaks everything down. The things that I have changed based on what I have learned here already are; replacing the initial meeting with the Financial Road Map Interview™ and getting rid of everything like useless fact finders that ask the same thing over and over and leading (probing) questions. I am just not sure what you would advise on the number of meetings to implement.
b I am uncertain of how to proceed in the following situation: My 85 year old client (client for 20 years) now needs aged care accommodation. His sons are taking power over his financial affairs without notifying him to avoid any upset. I saw him last week. He is in good shape considering and understands the need for aged care but not aware the sons have taken over control of the financial affairs I met with the sons last week and am due to meet again on November 24th about their father’s care and ongoing service. I have already offer them the opportunity to get their respective Financial Road Maps® completed -- One dominant brother had responded back, “No, not required at this stage.” My client warned me about 7 years ago to be very careful of the dominant son. The sons are anxious to get father repositioned (I hope for right reasons) into aged care --- without some of the streamlined systems I have used in last 7-8 years --- aged care would have occurred much earlier. This is a good client (past loyalty) and a survival client at approximately $24k paid annually. Should I ask the sons to reposition to a new adviser given that my client is their father and they now wish to take over his affairs? I would like to help the father but feel it’s incorrect to get involved with him and his sons.
b My personal office is a nice size but not big enough for a separate round conference table. I do have a separate conference room which offers a good setting with no distractions; however, it includes a 10 foot conference room table with 10 chairs around it. Any suggestions as to how I should address that?
» More articles