My RIA Financial Plan Contract specifies the delivery of a written financial plan that addresses certain specified areas. Implementation is totally separate and not included with the plan. I am having problems reconciling what I am now learning, with the requirements of my RIA (including a "complete" plan with recommendations). What do you recommend as a temporary "bridge' between the two approaches? (Note: both are "values based", they just go about it differently).

Article ID: 334

Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019

I see no conflict here. Adding the Financial Road Map® which clearly defines their goals and values will only help you create a better plan which your clients will more enthusiastically implement.

Also listed in

Miscellaneous

« As a "newbie" to the Bachrach & Associates process, I have been...

I have been advised that there is a psychology that comes into... »

Others in this category

I have worked with many of my existing clients for several years and when we first met I conducted a Values Conversation but did not continue through the remaining parts. Now I am having discussions with these people by the Old World/New World™ Conversations. My question is do I do a completely new Financial Road map® from start to finish or do I start from their old staircase of answers. Understand most of these clients had the Values Conversation over 5 years ago.

After completing the Financial Road Map® Interview with friends to help me get more experience, they decided to get a financial plan done. I relayed the cost of completing the plan, but not the cost of an on-going relationship (as I was unsure that was the best time to have that discussion being fairly new to the process). I am meeting them Saturday morning to have a pre-planning meeting. What is the best practice for inviting them into my Ideal Client community at this point and discussing the annual fee (I am thinking $10K...this would be my first Ideal Client invite)?

I’m a little confused about the level of commitment we are expecting from a new client once they hire us. In the script and videos it seems that during the Commitment to Implement we expect that at the implementation meeting the client will follow all of the action plan items and sign all of the documents we have prepared for signature, no questions asked. However, on the most recent Webinar, it sounded to me that regardless of what we may have said at Commitment to Implement, at the actual implementation meeting, it is more of a “traditional” approach where we are presenting our “recommendations” and it’s up to the client to decide which items, if any, they implement. To sum up, it seems that at the implementation meeting the approach is much less “take it or leave it” than presented during the Commitment to Implement. Please help me understand.

I have conducted Financial Road Maps with a few clients approximately 1 year ago. I did NOT ask them to join my Ideal Client Community at the time as I did not feel they could afford my Predictable Minimum Annual Recurring Revenue and / or they did not have enough assets. They are currently survival clients. I would like to ask them to come in again to update their Financial Road Maps and at the same time ask them to join our ideal client community as I have more clarity around their income and feel they could now pay my Predictable Minimum Annual Recurring Revenue. How would you suggest I conduct this second meeting? For example, should I ask them to bring in all their documents again, update their Financial Road Maps, and go through commitment to hire outlining exactly what they get and what it costs to join the ideal client community and see where it goes?

How should I handle a Financial Road Map Interview™ with potential clients who are living together but not married and who don’t co-mingle their finances?

» More articles