Sign in

Ask a Question | FAQ Home |

Browse by category

During the Financial Road Map Interview™ when I’m telling the client exactly what they’re going to get in the way of a financial plan, the script talks about the four areas but never mentions their goals that we just spent time and energy identifying and then emotionally tying to them. Is it just assumed that the goals will be planned? Seems like I should say we’ll give you a plan for meeting your goals, which is of course, what we do.

Article ID: 207

Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019

The goals are referenced in the script. Page 54 of Module 2. You may find it easier to print the script from the document CD.

Also listed in

Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Commitment to Hire Conversation™ Misc.

« How does one “politely disengage” from existing clients with...

Because I am both building my Ideal Client Community AND... »

Others in this category

What do you say to someone who doesn't think they need a financial adviser? During the Pre-Commitment™, a prospective client specified that he didn't feel he needed a financial adviser. Thus he never agreed to become a client. Is there something I should have said or should I just move on to the next person who "gets it"?

During our Commitment to Hire™ and Commitment to Implement Conversations™, the clients expresses their concern that, “we not go too fast.” They agreed to all the money, but, that does not mean all the money RIGHT NOW (Or even the day we are scheduled to begin implementation). We are talking here about the entirety of their life's work, their health and the rest of their lives, their savings, investments, home, their children and grandchildren's future - and they are justifiably cautious about making a global decision - Trust - but verify. It is only prudent and wise financial planning! Are top advisors taking All The Money on that first implementation day? How does THAT happen?

Should we prepare a list or outline of our Deliverables Team to show to people in the event they ask a question during the Commitment to Hire Conversation™, or just outline it verbally to them?

I have several existing clients and prospects that have zero debt and range typically from $3-$10 million in liquid net worth. Many of them have believed in “Term and invest the rest” mentality and therefore don't like to discuss insurance needs and their term policies have expired. By this, I'm referring to clients who are past the accumulation phase and confident in their mind that they have been adequately insured and no longer need much insurance (I realize this may not be true), and have the notion typically to only buy term and put the rest of their money into savings. When we get to the Commitment to Hire Conversation™. Many of my existing clients have zero debt, more cash then they need to have sitting around (I realize this needs to be addressed), and don't feel they need much help with insurance. Therefore the step-by-step plan addressing these four areas only has one area where they typically want, or feel, they need help in creating a plan. I'm curious if it would it make sense to change the "What you get” discussion to something that could provide a little more value than the 4 bullets currently in the script? Can you please tell me perhaps a different word track then the Financial Road Map® script since two of the four areas are not of much interest to these types of clients?

In the Commitment to Hire™ script you say, "Would you like to hire us to create this plan for you?" I'm assuming that, as a solo practitioner with one administrative assistant, I'd say, "Would like to hire me" not "us." Or is there a reason to say "us"?

» More articles

Powered by KBPublisher (Knowledge base software)