File was not found on server.

How do we "politely disengage" during the Financial Road Map Interview™ process prior to the Commitment to Hire Conversation™ if we don't feel it will be a "good fit"?

Article ID: 104
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019

Tell the truth and give them some sound advice about what to do next that doesn’t include you. This is why the language BEFORE Commitment to Hire Conversation™ is so important. It gives you a chance to reflect how the Financial Road Map Interview™ has gone so far and make a good decision about whether or not you want to offer to be hired.

The Clients' answer to the question: “So, what’s the value to you of the work that we’ve done so far in putting together your Financial Road Map®?” will affirm whether or not your gut feeling about offering to be hired or not is right.

If you don't feel it would be a good fit, it could sound something like this, "Well John & Mary, I’ve really enjoyed helping you with your Financial Road Map® today. I hope you’ve gotten value from the experience. To be perfectly frank I don’t think that it would be appropriate for me to offer our services to you at this time. Here’s what I recommend as logical next steps for you…"

You could refer them to another Values-Based Financial Planner™ at your firm or in your area who would be a better fit. Also tell them to read the chapter in the Values-Based Financial Planning™ book about how to find a good advisor and follow that process. Or whatever else you think is good advice.

Just be honest and don’t feel guilty. This is your business. Keep your business and your charity separate. You have an obligation to your family and your clients to run a good, profitable business so you can be of the most value in both your personal and professional life.

Please click the attachment below for Bill Bachrach's audio version of this answer.

Attached files
item CCS BB Answer.mp3 (2.92 mb) Download

Also listed in
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Disengaging from Non-Ideal Clients


Others in this category
b During our Commitment to Hire™ and Commitment to Implement Conversations™, the clients expresses their concern that, “we not go too fast.” They agreed to all the money, but, that does not mean all the money RIGHT NOW (Or even the day we are scheduled to begin implementation). We are talking here about the entirety of their life's work, their health and the rest of their lives, their savings, investments, home, their children and grandchildren's future - and they are justifiably cautious about making a global decision - Trust - but verify. It is only prudent and wise financial planning! Are top advisors taking All The Money on that first implementation day? How does THAT happen?
b During my first meeting with existing clients, I have a short Old World New World™ discussion. After asking them if they have any questions, I move into the Financial Road Map®. A number of clients, however, during Commitment to Hire Conversation™, still have significant questions related to the Old World. In fact, they clearly trust me more and are more willing to ask the "hard questions." How should I handle this?
b I am struggling not discussing an ongoing fee in Financial Road Map® Meeting. During this conversation the clients ask me how much? The Financial Road Map® Meeting has been around 45 minutes so far and going well. I say $5,000 for the initial plan. They say what do you get? I then run through my 2 page letter of engagement which outlines upfront and ongoing service offering and takes another 45 minutes. After 1.5 hours I feel like the clients are tired and the "would you like to proceed” has lost its presence because of the meeting time. How do I avoid this? I would love to skip the letter of engagement all together, should I just briefly talk about deliverables team (which I have) best-in-class Subject Matters Experts. I am also struggling to understand in the Implementation Meeting how to address the ongoing fee is $1k-$3k per month and not go over the plan in any detail.
b I have been running a "quarterback" model business for the last few years so hiring me to do what I’ve already been doing BUT much better shouldn’t even be questioned. However, most clients I have on a AUM fee, discretionary agreement. I'd like to present a new "flat fee" discretionary agreement, with formalizing me as the Trusted Advisor. Do you have an outline of items recommended in the agreement or examples I can give my attorney to create one for me. AND should I use the Commitment to Hire part of the Financial Road Map® meeting to have them sign to commit?
b What do you say to someone who doesn't think they need a financial adviser? During the Pre-Commitment™, a prospective client specified that he didn't feel he needed a financial adviser. Thus he never agreed to become a client. Is there something I should have said or should I just move on to the next person who "gets it"?
» More articles