File was not found on server.

How does one “politely disengage” from existing clients with whom I no longer want to work? Perhaps an example?

Article ID: 178
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2019

Just tell them the truth. It might sound like, “I have decided to take my business in a direction where I exclusively work with people who want to do comprehensive financial planning, are delegators – in other words people who will follow my advice and do everything I recommend pretty much no questions asked, and are willing and able to pay me $________ / year for my services. I have the impression that the way I will be running my business from now on may not be a good fit for you. What do you think?” It’s very likely they will recognize that it’s time for them to move on and find another advisor and tell you so. Express your appreciation for having them as a client and agree to course of action for them to find a new advisor and time-frame for them to move their accounts and business to the new advisor. At Commitment to Hire: just don’t offer to be hired, instead say something like, “Well, I hope you got some value from completing your FRM today. You can take this with you and use it as a guide for making better decisions about your money on your own or find it useful in selecting the right FA for you.

Please click the attachment below for Bill Bachrach's audio version of this answer.

Attached files
item What is the best way to disengag from clients you don't believe fit your ICP.mp3 (5.37 mb) Download

Also listed in
folder Financial Road Map® Misc.
folder Commitment to Hire Conversation™ -> Disengaging from Non-Ideal Clients


Others in this category
b Is it possible to have clients that are not Ideal Clients yet, but may be Ideal Clients in the future?
b Before the Financial Road Map® meeting, I find myself talking about all the ways I'm different from the average advisor. I discuss the 5 Critical Reports, visualizing your Ideal Life, not being on commission, etc. I do this with people who have and have not worked with an "advisor" in the past. Sometimes it must sound like I'm too busy defending myself rather than being confident in the process. Should I even discuss how I'm different or should I just take them through the process and trust that they will come up with these discoveries on their own?
b I have been following the script with Commitment to Hire Conversation ™ and detailing them exactly what they will get. We had a Follow-Up Meeting the other day with a client where we do a Risk Profile (legal requirement) and they were asking further questions around money management etc. Although they knew they were getting a plan they didn’t realize we handled everything (i.e. professional money management) and they said if they realized we did so much they would have been far keener to go ahead. Should we also have a list of client deliverables to show them?
b I am struggling not discussing an ongoing fee in Financial Road Map® Meeting. During this conversation the clients ask me how much? The Financial Road Map® Meeting has been around 45 minutes so far and going well. I say $5,000 for the initial plan. They say what do you get? I then run through my 2 page letter of engagement which outlines upfront and ongoing service offering and takes another 45 minutes. After 1.5 hours I feel like the clients are tired and the "would you like to proceed” has lost its presence because of the meeting time. How do I avoid this? I would love to skip the letter of engagement all together, should I just briefly talk about deliverables team (which I have) best-in-class Subject Matters Experts. I am also struggling to understand in the Implementation Meeting how to address the ongoing fee is $1k-$3k per month and not go over the plan in any detail.
b When you review the outline of your Deliverables Team in the Commitment to Hire Conversation™, is this done in response to a specific question a client may ask?
» More articles